aifaq.wtf

It's just a fun little image editing space.

It's kind of obvious that most people involved in this AI hype-cycle today are excited because they assume continuous "infinite" improvements over time. But what they seem to fail to take into account is the embedded error rates (as these are heuristic systems by definition) that you'll never be able to get rid of.

...

We may very well get a decent AI based text summarization tool, but it will certainly have to use a different model than current architectures imo.

Love it, filing under #lol for pain.

These are honestly not that interesting.

I think red teaming by people who want the system to fail is probably your best bet. Get some real haters on board.

If it exists online, they're gonna take it.

Some OpenAI employees discussed how such a move might go against YouTube’s rules, three people with knowledge of the conversations said. YouTube, which is owned by Google, prohibits use of its videos for applications that are “independent” of the video platform.

Ultimately, an OpenAI team transcribed more than one million hours of YouTube videos, the people said. The team included Greg Brockman, OpenAI’s president, who personally helped collect the videos, two of the people said. The texts were then fed into a system called GPT-4, which was widely considered one of the world’s most powerful A.I. models and was the basis of the latest version of the ChatGPT chatbot.

Doesn't matter what original license you might have granted or what makes sense, it's alllll theirs.

Last year, Google also broadened its terms of service. One motivation for the change, according to members of the company’s privacy team and an internal message viewed by The Times, was to allow Google to be able to tap publicly available Google Docs, restaurant reviews on Google Maps and other online material for more of its A.I. products.

I think my favorite point in the piece is how Meta came from a weaker position because Facebook users don't post essay-like content.