There's a delicate balancing act between "it can answer anything a child asks!" and "it is a box full of lies," but anyone who's read A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer is going to be excited about the future of LLMs for education.
"How do you know about all this AI stuff?"
I just read tweets, buddy.
Page 2 of 2
There's a delicate balancing act between "it can answer anything a child asks!" and "it is a box full of lies," but anyone who's read A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer is going to be excited about the future of LLMs for education.
We need user interface alignment instead of just model alignment.
Actual article is here: Instructor Accuses Texas A&M Class of Using ChatGPT, Withholds Grades
βIn Grading your last three assignments I have opened my own account for Chat GTP [sic],β the teacher wrote. βI copy and paste your responses in this account and Chat GTP will tell me if the program generated the content. I put everyone's last three assignments through two separate times and if they were both claimed by Chat GTP you received a 0.β
Sigh. The big problem is while this is obviously very very silly, there are plenty of tools that claim to be AI detectors. They don't work.
Language models generate boring text, so plagiarism detectors detect boring, predictable text. Do you know who else generates boring, predictable text? Students writing boring papers about predictable prompts. And journalists.