"How do you know about all this AI stuff?"
I just read tweets, buddy.
Page 2 of 2
Know this one got me an early lead in trivia the other day.
I'd just like to note that every single time there have been big error-ful articles produced by AI, it was always in "collaboration with" or "edited by" a human, despite the remarkable number of errors. In its current state this stuff only works on reader-facing content if you invest a lot of the resources that you thought you'd be saving on.
We're going to see a lot of people doubling down on the (accidental? incidental?) falsehoods spread by ChatGPT.
The reason to read Hacker News on AI is much less to learn anything and much more to learn what other people are thinking. The passion, the intensity, the fervor!!!
Top-voted comment is really doing its best to coax anyone and everyone out of their holes:
I think the author is far too pessimistic about the capabilities of ML...However - the level of Silicon Valley Bro VC funded hype is totally out of this world.
And (roughly) immediately eveything devolves into arguments about self-driving cars. Rightly so?